stone cheats
Posted: December 2nd, 2007, 11:32 am
Your favorite server eh StoneCold?StoneCold wrote:fl00d3d wrote:lmfao, can we call it:
TsuGaming.com :: RGH Hangout
??
hahahah
Your favorite server eh StoneCold?StoneCold wrote:fl00d3d wrote:lmfao, can we call it:
TsuGaming.com :: RGH Hangout
??
hahahah
funny thing is sorta the same except prob he has a diff keyboard than mineCrazyreb wrote:difference is you just got in the vehicle for the first time(on air on map under). not trying to start any new arguments, but his 2 screenshots are different.
/agree with all of thisfl00d3d wrote: Factually, it is not proof. End of story. You can't even argue that it is, because it doesn't PROVE anything. It only proves that it could have happened if he had RGH on. But it doesn't actually prove RGH itself. Which is why I gave him the benefit of the doubt, and why he is unbanned.
How many times have I heard complaints about you Reb? Or others? I defend others just as much. Without proof = I won't ban. I even did a poll, which didn't pass.
And I'm willing to bet that over half of the people that say stonecold cheat's are cheaters themselves (radar hack, and in some cases aimbot).
then u shouldnt have voted yes (on topic bout me in mod hangout) fuckerCrazyreb wrote:/agree with all of thisfl00d3d wrote: Factually, it is not proof. End of story. You can't even argue that it is, because it doesn't PROVE anything. It only proves that it could have happened if he had RGH on. But it doesn't actually prove RGH itself. Which is why I gave him the benefit of the doubt, and why he is unbanned.
How many times have I heard complaints about you Reb? Or others? I defend others just as much. Without proof = I won't ban. I even did a poll, which didn't pass.
And I'm willing to bet that over half of the people that say stonecold cheat's are cheaters themselves (radar hack, and in some cases aimbot).
and you swearing at people isn't helping anything either; learn to ignore it, I'm sure you've had lots of practice.StoneCold wrote:then u shouldnt have voted yes (on topic bout me in mod hangout) fuckerCrazyreb wrote:/agree with all of thisfl00d3d wrote: Factually, it is not proof. End of story. You can't even argue that it is, because it doesn't PROVE anything. It only proves that it could have happened if he had RGH on. But it doesn't actually prove RGH itself. Which is why I gave him the benefit of the doubt, and why he is unbanned.
How many times have I heard complaints about you Reb? Or others? I defend others just as much. Without proof = I won't ban. I even did a poll, which didn't pass.
And I'm willing to bet that over half of the people that say stonecold cheat's are cheaters themselves (radar hack, and in some cases aimbot).