Suggestions:
why is fl00d in 24th place?? U have highest rank and most posts..lol
Suggest u fix
& btw is this the proper way to bring up something like this?? if not lemme know
Compliments: Love the servers & Community, the ppl (98%) are cool, the authorities for the most part are firm & just.. nobody's perfect, but Tsu definately Raises the bar.
SpAzEr wrote:@ sadistik... your big multicoloured responses are getting intimidating... when I see them, I shrivel up a little bit inside.
I don't know if that makes sense. Anyway, it does the same thing in the admin panel. It basically organizes "ranks" (titles) by the image you use (number of stars, color, etc.). It really has nothing to do with your level of authority on the site. It's nothing more than a way to group people of similar rank together on the memberlist.
Ohmypants wrote:o, so just grouping same ranks together instead of listing rank 1-1197.. gotcha
Ohmypants wrote: & btw is this the proper way to bring up something like this?? if not lemme know
No, there is NO #1, #2, etc. So get that idea out of your head right now. I mean, yeah - there is that sort of thing unofficially (ie. I'm the founder so I'm "ranked #1") but there's nothing on the forums that can show you that. The 'ranks' you see there aren't really ranks. They're more of a 'title'. phpBB coders call custom titles 'custom ranks' in the admin panel.
Hey.. I noticed now some ppl don't have ranks at all?? RRkiller was one of them.. Idk if accident or on purpose but.. thot someone should know if not supposed to b that way.
(and so that ppl don't think I still don't get fl00ds point he made to me about a month ago on this same topic..) what i mean is there's no Stars at all next to their name where other ppl do have stars..
SpAzEr wrote:@ sadistik... your big multicoloured responses are getting intimidating... when I see them, I shrivel up a little bit inside.
Ohmypants wrote:Hey.. I noticed now some ppl don't have ranks at all?? RRkiller was one of them.. Idk if accident or on purpose but.. thot someone should know if not supposed to b that way.
(and so that ppl don't think I still don't get fl00ds point he made to me about a month ago on this same topic..) what i mean is there's no Stars at all next to their name where other ppl do have stars..
That's because there are like 5 levels of "ranks" that are automatic (ie. if you have no special rank, then youre part of the default rank system which has five or so levels). And the first 'rank' has no rank image associated with it. The rest do (stars).
ya, it's something like over 100-150 posts until u get a star.. but killer has about 2500 posts.. and a blank rank (group)
Btw the Dunce rank is really funny lmao
SpAzEr wrote:@ sadistik... your big multicoloured responses are getting intimidating... when I see them, I shrivel up a little bit inside.
Hawk wrote:I tink thats the number that they joined the forums at o.o
The number on the far left is just the sort order. And if you try to sort by registration date or anything like that, it won't be exactly right because we've merged with a few databases in the last few years ... so its not entirely accurate.
He was suggesting that something be fixed because he thought it was broke. And then I explained it wasn't broke and it just kept going. Let's not split hairs.
